Saturday, December 28, 2019
The Meaning of the Surname Pierce
The Pierce surname was adapted from the given name Piers,à a derivation of Peter, which means rock, from the Old French pierreà (Latin petra), meaning stone or rock. The name most commonly derived as a surnameà meaning son or descendant of Piers or Peter. However, it may also have been bestowed or chosen as a topographic name for someone who lived in a rocky area, or as an occupational name for a quarryman or stone mason.à Famous People with the Pierce Surname Franklin Pierceà - 14th president of the United StatesWendell Pierce -à American award-winning actorBarbara Pierce Bushà -à wife of George H.W. Bush, 41st president of the United StatesGeorge Washington Pierce - Harvard professor of physics;à inventorNat Pierceà - American jazz pianistMarvin Pierce - American publisher; president of McCall Corporation Where the Pierceà Surname Is Most Common According to surname distribution from Forebears, the Pierce surname is most common in the United States, where it ranks among the top 200 surnames in the country. It is also somewhat common in Wales (ranks 350th) and Ireland (581st). Within Ireland, Pierce is most commonly found in Wexford, Carlow and Kerry. WorldNames PublicProfiler indicates a similar distribution, with the greatest percentage of individuals named Pierce found throughout the United States. The name is especially common in the southeast, including Mississippi, Arkansas, Tennessee, Texas, Alabama, North Carolina and Georgia. Genealogy Resources for the Surname Pierce Pierceà Family Crest - Its Not What You Think: Contrary to what you may hear, there is no such thing as a Pierceà family crest or coat of arms for the Pierce surname.à Coats of arms are granted to individuals, not families, and may rightfully be used only by the uninterrupted male line descendants of the person to whom the coat of arms was originally granted. The Pierceà DNA Project - Southern US: Individuals with the Pierceà surname, and variants such as Pearce, Peirce, Pearse, Pierse, and Percy, with ancestors from southern U.S. statesà are invited to participate in this group DNA project in an attempt to learn more about southern Pierce family origins. The website includes information on the project, the research done to date, and instructions on how to participate. PIERCEà Family Genealogy Forum: This free message board is focused on descendants of Pierceà ancestors around the world. FamilySearch - Pierce Genealogy: Explore over 4à million results from digitizedà historical records and lineage-linked family trees related to the Pierce surname on this free website hosted by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Pierce Surname Mailing List: Free mailing list for researchers of the Pierceà surname and its variations includes subscription details and a searchable archives of past messages. DistantCousin.com - Pierce Genealogy Family History: Explore free databases and genealogy links for the last name Pierce. GeneaNet - Pierceà Records: GeneaNet includes archival records, family trees, and other resources for individuals with the Pierceà surname, with a concentration on records and families from France and other European countries. The Pierceà Genealogy and Family Tree Page: Browse genealogy records and links to genealogical and historical records for individuals with the Pierceà surname from the website of Genealogy Today. References: Surname Meanings Origins Cottle, Basil.à Penguin Dictionary of Surnames. Baltimore, MD: Penguin Books, 1967. Dorward, David.à Scottish Surnames. Collins Celtic (Pocket edition), 1998. Fucilla, Joseph.à Our Italian Surnames. Genealogical Publishing Company, 2003. Hanks, Patrick and Flavia Hodges.à A Dictionary of Surnames. Oxford University Press, 1989. Hanks, Patrick.à Dictionary of American Family Names. Oxford University Press, 2003. Reaney, P.H.à A Dictionary of English Surnames. Oxford University Press, 1997. Smith, Elsdon C.à American Surnames. Genealogical Publishing Company, 1997.
Friday, December 20, 2019
Symptoms And Treatment Of Elderly Patients - 1781 Words
Patient factors include age, gender, education, ethnicity, socio-economic status and how much patient knows about cancer and cancer symptoms. Age appears to be the major determinants of cancer survival. Cancer survival rate for almost all types of cancers decrease significantly with age. Research has shown that elderly patients generally do not receive the same standard of treatments and care, as compared to younger patients. Elderly patients are also reported to be less likely to receive surgery and the most effective treatment than younger people irrespective of the co-morbidities. This is because healthcare professionals tend to make decisions based on the assumptions that older patients will not be able to cope with certain treatmentsâ⬠¦show more contentâ⬠¦Cancer signs are often mistaken as the symptoms of their mental health condition or side effects of the medications they are taking. This ultimately leads to a poorer cancer prognosis in the UK. (Independent Cancer Task force, 2015) The Black and Minor Ethnic (BME) communities also reported a worse treatment and care experience compare to other race groups. However, links between race and cancer are often complex and vary between different populations. (Department of Health, 2010) Health inequalities can be clearly seen in the uptake variation of screening programmes available in England. For instance, 23% of BME women claimed that they have never had a cervical screening as compared to 14% of white women at screening age. (Joââ¬â¢s Cervical Cancer Trust, 2012) Other than that, communication and public awareness about cancer is crucial in improving cancer outcome. It has been proven that good communication between healthcare professionals and patients aids in early diagnosis, increase in patientsââ¬â¢ self management, decrease emergency admissions, decrease health inequalities and appears to save cost for the NHS as well. The 2010 Cancer Patient Experience Survey highlights that there are man y patients do not understand the doctors and nurses about their diagnosis and conditions most of the time. Also, a significant number of patients state that there is always not
Thursday, December 12, 2019
Leadership for Quality Effectiveness and Safety in Health Care
Question: Discuss about the Leadership for Quality Effectiveness and Safety in Health Care. Answer: Introduction This report emphasizes on the evaluation of the relationship exist between work performance, human factors and quality and safety in healthcare. There are different healthcare systems are designed by the organizations for the purpose of meeting different needs of the patients to improve the quality of care and safety of patients. Human resources play a significant role in improving the processes of nursing. It is essential for the organizations to develop effective communication platform in order to clarify the information related to the roles and responsibilities carried out by doctors and nurses in hospitals. Human factors are considered important for the management of systems and process design as it helps in development of the required capabilities in the workforce. Nowadays, healthcare organizations focus on human factors as they facilitates in development of different strategies for improving patient safety. The biggest challenge faced by healthcare institutions is maintaining and developing patient safety by delivering quality care services to the patients. The thesis statement is that there is an existence of the significant relationship between human factors, work performance and quality and patient safety in healthcare that helps in fostering safe and positive work culture in the organization. Identification of human factors related to work performance In relation to this, Fryer (n.d.) stated that human factors are considered as an important process design which helps in building capabilities and limitations of workforce. There is a need of human factor design in the nursing profession as there are various challenges that are faced by nursing profession. For the purpose of mitigating such challenges like unmonitored workloads which is associated with the scope and role of a nurse in a direct or indirect manner, human factor design is appropriate. Human factor emphasis on the analysis of the properties of the human being capability and limitation for the purpose on engineering elements like development, distribution, application design and categorization of services and systems. This helps in improving the quality, safety and operational performance of the organization. In the views of Cafazzo and Cyr (2012), there is an increasing the trend of human factors engineering in the healthcare which improves safety and efficiency. The strategies related to behavior change helps in improving the performance of employees in order to ensure patient safety in the hospitals. Nowadays, different practitioners adopted a systematic approach for the purpose of mitigating the human errors by designing the socio-technical work environment. Along with this, human resources also tend to rely on interventions that results in improving the user performance by the way of providing training to reduce the impact of adverse events. There is also an increased dependency on automation with little intervention of human beings might result in propagate errors in the system in an easy manner. There is a need of human beings for the purpose of making judgments related to the provision of different care services to patients in order to eliminate errors. Human resources in the medical industry uses user centered design for the purpose of creating systems where different prototypes and concepts can employ training for optimization of the design of the system. The other framework is the ecological interface design which is used in the healthcare to design human machine interface for complex systems. This helps in gaining information related to unanticipated conditions occurred that hurdles the patient safety. This framework helps in modernizing the user interface of high risk radiotherapy and detection of cardiovascular risks. In contrast to this, Patel and Kannampallil (2014) states that the health information systems do not guarantee the safety and care of the patients in the healthcare institutions. The implementation of a HEF helps in the designing of the healthcare systems that has a significant impact on the quality of care and patient safety. This approach helps in improving the performance of the staff members of the healthcare institutions by addressing cognitive and physical limitations. There is a need of establishing a close relationship between the healthcare professions and HIT for the purpose of attaining the success of the systems in the organization. For bringing the improvement in patient safety and quality, HFE has used macro-ergonomic approaches for the prediction of the patient safety and quality of care. The different elements of this approach include joint optimization of human performance and well being, systems oriented approach, organizational and socio-technical context and inter actions between various elements of the system. The different macro-ergonomic models are SEIPS model and healthcare professional performance model. In support of this, Holden, et al. (2013) states that SEIPS is a prevalent healthcare human factors framework that embraces three major human factors principles such as system orientation, person centeredness and design driven improvements. The system orientation emphasizes on the interaction of socio-technical system. This has resulted in replacement of blame the person culture with the holistic system based approach. Along with this, the person centeredness principle states that the human beings are central element of healthcare work system as the work system has to align with the limitations, capabilities and performance needs of the people involved in it. The design driven improvements principle integrates the person centered design and the system in order to get effective and efficient results. There are six interacting components such as tasks, technologies, tools, internal environment and external environment. The characteristics of these factors include variety, ambiguity, sequence and complexity. It also consists of different tools and technologies that are used by the people to increase their productivity in order to increase the profitability of the healthcare systems. This model provides a hierarchical arrangement of the work system. It also takes into account of engaging healthcare professionals with the work processes in order to attain effective and efficient results. In addition to this, it also engages patients in an active manner for the purpose of improving their safety and quality of care provided to them. For this purpose, there is a need of gaining information related to the symptoms and history of the family to diagnose the diseases in order to provide proper treatment to the patients. Critically analyse the relationship between human factors and quality and safety in healthcare In support of this, Xie and Carayon (2015) state that human factors and ergonomics is considered as a significant approach for improving healthcare processes, and work systems to improve the patient safety and quality of care. The absence of such systems for the purpose of implementing different processes, healthcare technologies, socio-technical systems, workflows, and jobs may lead to the occurrence of different poor quality of care and patient safety incidents like job dissatisfaction, injuries, burnout, turnover, adverse drug events and medication errors. This system helps in addressing different issues related to cognitive, physical and organization such as mismatch between physical characteristics of healthcare professionals and task requirements, limited information for clinical decision making and job stress. In support of this, Gluyas and Hookham (2016), stated that the staff members and nurses have to manage overloaded information by the use of human factor design which is a automated behavior that has several skills and help nurses to do multi task which results in the occurrence of capture errors. This has resulted in avoiding or neglecting the patient safety in the hospitals. There is an occurrence of various shifts in the hospitals due to which the staff members handed the documents to the staff of next shift after the completion of their shifts which may result in redundancy of the work and negligence over the observations of the patient health and communicate to the authorized person to put attention on the safety of patients by providing high quality of care. This results in the occurrence of error provoking conditions and leads to the occurrence of lack of adequate monitoring of the patient which might result in the death of the patient. There is an occurrence of different errors such as slips and lapses which influences task, situational and cognitive factors that create active errors that affect the patient. In order to reducing these types of errors, there is a need to provide training to staff members for spreading awareness about human fallibility. This helps in identification of risk factors to develop competence in identification of risk factors (Gluyas and Hookham, 2016). Carayon et al. (2014) states that there are different human factor systems approaches that helps in improving the patient safety and healthcare quality. This is the system which is successfully applied in the healthcare research. This system helps in balancing the work system and encouraging the active role of workers in improving patient safety and healthcare quality. Besides this, improvement in physical design of a medical device helps in understanding t6he organizational context, where these technologies are used to improve the patient safety and healthcare quality. In addition to this, integration of the work system model i.e. SPO model of Donabedian with the SEIPS model helps in increasing the acceptability of the SEIPS model by the healthcare community. The SEIPS model helps in gaining outcomes related to patient safety and healthcare quality. This model helps in designing work systems that provide benefits to patients and healthcare workers and organizations. There are differ ent HFE applications that helps in reducing the risks related to occupational safety and health of workers like reduction in musculoskeletal disorders of nurses. In the views of Kaufman and Mc Caughan (2013), organizational culture also plays a significant role in improving the patient safety and healthcare quality in the organization. Implementation of effective leadership in a clinical setting helps providing creation of safer and healthier environments. The nurse leader in the healthcare institutions communicates the information related to the vision of patient centered care and motivates employees to achieve this vision. This can be achieved through role modeling to set the standards for team performance and responding towards the lapses in the patient care. Companies such as NHS uses corporate governance framework for the purpose of improving standards of care. The key elements of safety culture such as leadership and team work results in reducing the failures and creating the environment of trust. In the views of Gurses, Ozok and Pronovost (2011), HFE considers individuals as an integral part of healthcare systems by focusing on the abilities and limitations to attain optimization of the performance of the overall system. HFE focuses on designing of the user friendly interfaces that improves the performance of the users and reduction in the human error. In order to integrate the human factors in patient safety, there is a need of building the capacity of present and future healthcare providers to understand the HFE. There is a need to create market forces to producing those products which incorporate HFE principles and techniques. There is a need to establish coordination between manufacturers and suppliers in order to create safer products for the healthcare institutions in order to improve patient safety. Conclusion It can be concluded that human factor design is used for the purpose of mitigating different challenges faced by nursing professional in improving the patient safety and quality of care. The challenges faced by nursing professionals include unmonitored workloads. In order to improve patient safety and quality of care in the healthcare institutions, different HFE models are implemented that helps in integrating the capabilities of the workforce with the tools and techniques used to carry out different activities. Besides this, there is an active participation of the patients in improving their safety as the healthcare professionals gain information related to the family history and symptoms for the purpose of diagnosing the problem and provide care services to ensure patient safety. Different HFE systems help in balancing the work system which helps in improving the patient safety in the organization. Along with this, leadership also plays a significant role in improving the efficiencies of the nurses in the organization as it helps in acting as a role model and communicating the information related to the vision to the team members which results in improving the overall productivity of the organization. it is also summarized that the thesis statement is restated as there is an existence of the significant relationship between human factors, work performance and quality and patient safety in healthcare that helps in fostering safe and positive work culture in the organization. References Cafazzo, J.A. Cyr, O.S. (2012). From discovery to design: the evolution of human factors in healthcare. Healthcare Quarterly 15, 24-29. Carayona, P., Wetternecka, T.B. Rodriguezd, A.J.R., Hundta, A.S. Hoonakkera, P., Holdene, R. Gursesf, A.P. (2014). Human factors systems approach to healthcare quality and patient safety. Appl Ergon 45(1), 14-25. Fryer, L.A. (n.d.). Human factors in nursing: The time is now. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing 30(2), 56-65. Gluyas, H. Hookham, E.M. (2016). Human factors and the death of a child in hospital: a case review. Nursing Standard 30, 46-51. Gurses, A.P., Ozok, A.A. Pronovost, P.J. (2011). Time to accelerate integration of human factors and ergonomics in patient safety. BMJ Qual Saf 21,347-351. Holden, R.J., Carayon, P., Gurses, A.P., Hoonakker, P., Hundt, A.S., Ozok, A.A. Rodriguez, A.J.R. (2013). SEIPS 2.0: A human factors framework for studying and improving the work of healthcare professionals and patients. Ergonomics 56(11), 1-30. Kaufman G. McCaughan, D. (2013). The effect of organizational culture on patient safety. Nursing Standard 27 (43), 50-56. Patel, V.L. Kannampallil, T.G. (2014) Human Factors and Health Information Technology: Current Challenges and Future Directions. IMIA Yearbook of Medical Informatics, 58-66. Xie, A. Carayon, P. (2015). A systematic review of human factors and ergonomics (HFE) based healthcare system redesign for quality of care and patient safety. Ergonomics 58(1), 33-49.
Wednesday, December 4, 2019
Lenin Essay Example For Students
Lenin Essay LeninVladimir Ilyich Ulyanov, later known as Lenin was a key figure in European history. Lenin led the Bolsheviks (which later became known as communists) to overthrow the Russian Tsar, and to bring socialism to Russia. Lenin introduced Communism to Russia. This changed the history for Russia as well as the rest of Europe, and to this day has had a huge effect on the Russian economy. Lenins impact on Europe and Russia consisted of him applying Marxist ideas, which later led to complete Communism, and a threat to Europe and the rest of world. In developing his plan of socialism in Russia, Lenin followed the examples of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, the original developers of the communist theory. The main aspect of any kind of government, and especially socialism, is its economic structure. Lenin explained that in his economic theory, called Imperialism, the first step was to gradually move into a joined monopoly capitalist phase, which later would become communism. Lenin went on to say that based on the disproportion between economic development of the monopoly stage, which is the beginning of full socialism, and capitalism, which is the meaning of a private life and freedom from others. The only problem with that theory is that a Monopoly and Capitalism are complete opposites of each other, and were bound to cause problems.(http://venus.spaceports.com/~theory/economy_1.htm) Lenin knew of this problem, but considered it a stepping stone in the right direction. He predicted problems, but thought in due time his economi c machine would operate with great success, and make Russia into a world mega power. We will write a custom essay on Lenin specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now Lenins plan of communism for Russia was supposed to be great. People were supposed to get free education, free medical care, everybody makes the same amount of money, working equally as hard, and everybody was supposed to get the same advantage in life. But it would never work out quite as planed. On October 25, 1917 (November 7th according to the new Gregorian calendar), Lenin led the Bolsheviks in a Socialist Revolution that would lead Lenin in charge of Russia. Everything that had been set in stone about the life and culture of Russian over the past centuries, would change during the course of one night. People were expecting great things, Lenin and others associated with his party, made Karl Marxs ideas about Communism sound great. Once Lenin came to power and tried to execute his plans towards his nation things went terribly wrong for the people of Russia. The problems started with the working class or the proletariat, the people that Lenin put in charge of the nation. As common knowledge, proletariats are not the most educated people, with no knowledge of how to help run a Socialist government. So the proletariats started making decisions that would hurt the common man in Russia. Decease, hunger and even cannibalism struck over some parts of the nation, where as before in the Monarchy rule under Tsar Nicholas II, Russia was as rich in agriculture as any other country in the world.(Shinskaya) Another promise that Lenin kept was that he gave the peasants more land. Also, he forced the peasants to move to collective farms, called ?Kalhoz? (Russian). The peasants didnt have any privacy, all their personal belongings were taken and put to public use in their collective farms. An example of the changes going on in the work force, on socialistic collective farm, was farmers, one farmer has two cows, the other had none. In a communistic gover nment, where everybody is completely equal, Lenin would make the two farmers coexist and work with each other, and make the farmer with two cows share with the farmer with no cows at all. Allowing the farmer with no cows to free load off the farmer with two cows. That is Communism; unfair, but too bad, you cant do anything about it. The peasants became outraged and started to strike. Bolshevik at first sight of resistance began to shoot down innocent people fighting for their freedom, all by the order of Lenin.(Isayevich 98) The problems didnt end there. .u3e5b191a9855aa3c8033757aea181756 , .u3e5b191a9855aa3c8033757aea181756 .postImageUrl , .u3e5b191a9855aa3c8033757aea181756 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u3e5b191a9855aa3c8033757aea181756 , .u3e5b191a9855aa3c8033757aea181756:hover , .u3e5b191a9855aa3c8033757aea181756:visited , .u3e5b191a9855aa3c8033757aea181756:active { border:0!important; } .u3e5b191a9855aa3c8033757aea181756 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u3e5b191a9855aa3c8033757aea181756 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u3e5b191a9855aa3c8033757aea181756:active , .u3e5b191a9855aa3c8033757aea181756:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u3e5b191a9855aa3c8033757aea181756 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u3e5b191a9855aa3c8033757aea181756 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u3e5b191a9855aa3c8033757aea181756 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u3e5b191a9855aa3c8033757aea181756 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u3e5b191a9855aa3c8033757aea181756:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u3e5b191a9855aa3c8033757aea181756 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u3e5b191a9855aa3c8033757aea181756 .u3e5b191a9855aa3c8033757aea181756-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u3e5b191a9855aa3c8033757aea181756:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: There I was, standing high on top of a mountain EssayBack in the old days of Monarch Russia, the Russian people had a great belief of the church. In one of Karl Marxs publishings about communism, he replies ?Religion is opium for the common man.?(Isayevich 135) When Lenin took over he forbid religion, destroyed all the churches, and murdered all the priests, turning great national landmarks built by the blood and sweat of the Russian man into rubble. Anybody who tried to believe in something besides communism was murdered with out justice or a right to a trial by the authority of Vladimer Ilyich, Lenin. Lenin didnt want anyone to try to bring back the old Monarchy ways of Russia. He had the Bolshevik army murder Tsar Nicholas II, his wife, all his children and anybody who was associated with the Tsar.(Service 78) Lenins Bolshevik army, also known as the Red Army, went to a civil war with the peasants and the opposers of the socialist regime, which was the White Army. Russia was going through a turbulent time, fighting opposing nations, and a civil war that happened for eight months in the year 1918, and going through hunger, despair and decease.(Liberman)The plans of a world wide socialist revolution was now wide spread among neighboring nations. Based on their conclusions from Russia and how they handled the change and the horrible crimes that were committed against humanity on the part of the socialist party. Other countries around Europe wanted no part of communism, and considered it a serious threat to their existence. Bibliographynone
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)